About Us   Trial Watch   ACT   Tribunals   Truth Commissions   Int'l Law   Swiss
  english  français  deutsch  | Sitemap

  William Calley
 Portion of the Prosecution Brief on the Law of Principals in United States v. Captain Ernest L. Medina detailing the duties of a combat commander
University of Missouri - Kansas City School of Law
You have information to share ?
Or mistakes to correct ?
click here...

Receive future updates of this profile in your e-mail :

 

 

Become a member

 

 

Donate

 

 

Link to our Website

Ernest Medina

context : Vietnam Search
judgement place : United States Search
status : Acquitted
particulars : Acquitted on charges of premeditated murder, murder and assault
position : Army Captain
facts legal procedure
At the beginning of the trial, Ernest Medina was charged with the “premeditated murder” of at least 100 civilians. He was also accused of the murder of a woman and a child, and the assault of a prisoner. The military judge handling the affair, Colonel Kenneth A: Howard, later reduced the charge of “premeditated murder” to one of “involuntary manslaughter”. The charge relating to the murder of a child was dropped.

Then trial of Captain Medina raised the overall question of the responsibility of those in positions of leadership. The prosecutor laid out what such responsibility entails by reminding the court of the following points:

1. It is a well established rule in the military that a commander is responsible for the actions of his subordinates. This presupposes that he must give clear and concise orders and that he must adapt his orders in line with the situation as it evolves.

2. If war crimes have been committed by his soldiers, the commander himself also bears responsibility:
a) In the case where he himself gave the order to commit these crimes (direct responsibility); or
b) When he knew, or should have known, that the crimes had been committed or were about to be committed and he did not take all necessary and reasonable measures to safeguard the respect of International Humanitarian Law or to sanction those at fault.

3. Finally, every member of the armed forces, independent of his position, has the
obligation to report to his hierarchical superior as well as to the military legal authorities any act which could potentially be considered as a war crime.


In the question at issue the Jury considered that the evidence admitted during the trial was insufficient to establish guilt on the part of the Accused..

Captain Medina was acquitted on 22 September 1971.
Print  Send to a friend  Add to my favorites  
 nationality :
 United states
 date of birth :
 27.08.1936
  period of charges :
 16.03.1968 - 16.03.1968
  judgement period :
  22.09.1971 - 22.09.1971
  charges :
  War crimes
  profile last modified :
  03.03.2005
 
Investigation of the My Lai Incident. July 15, 1970 report by the My Lai Incident Subcommittee of the Armed Services Investigating Subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committee, pp. 1-26.
Armed Services Investigating Subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committee
Investigation of the My Lai Incident. July 15, 1970 report by the My Lai Incident Subcommittee of the Armed Services Investigating Subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committee, pp. 27-53.
Armed Services Investigating Subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committee
Report of the Department of the Army Review of the Preliminary Investigations of the My Lai Incident (The Peers Report),
William Peers
icl
Trial Watch has benefited from a financial support from the Loterie Romande and the City of Geneva.
Copyrights © 2009 trial-ch.org. All rights reserved - DB Engineering: J. Bédat, Design: X. Righetti - Legal informations