About Us   Trial Watch   ACT   Tribunals   Truth Commissions   Int'l Law   Swiss
  english  français  deutsch  | Sitemap

  Ibrahim Ahmed Mahmoud Al Qosi
  Salim Ahmed Hamdan
  Omar Ahmed Khadr
  Ali Hamza Ahmad Sulayman al Bahlul
 Lehrerin in Teddy-Affäre angeklagt - Briten beschweren sich bei ... - Der Spiegel
18.11.2008
Die Affäre um den Teddy Mohammed eskaliert: Die sudanesischen Behörden klagten jetzt die Lehrerin Gillian Gibbons an - der Name des Stofftiers sei Gotteslästerung. Der britische ...
TRIAL_TXT_RSS display all...
You have information to share ?
Or mistakes to correct ?
click here...

Receive future updates of this profile in your e-mail :

 

 

Become a member

 

 

Donate

 

 

Link to our Website

Abdul Zahir

context : Afghanistan Search
judgement place : United States Search
status : Indicted
particulars : Charged with conspiracy, aiding the enemy and attacking civilians
position : Translator and money man for al Qaeda
facts legal procedurespotlight
The military commission proceedings at Guantánamo are the first such war crimes trials conducted by the United States since World War II.

Of the 500 or so captives brought to Guantánamo from Afghanistan since 2002, only a small fraction is facing a military commission.

Human rights activists and military defence lawyers have criticized the commission rules, saying they favour prosecutors, allow evidence obtained through torture and hearsay and permit only limited independent judicial review. Critics also note that the Pentagon has never said it would actually free a defendant if he were acquitted.

Furthermore, the detainees are said to be charged with conducts that were not previously crimes or not previously recognized as war crimes.

The Supreme Court has heard on March 28, 2006, a challenge to George W. Bush's power to create military commissions to put Guantanamo prisoners on trial for war crimes (cf. the profile of Salim Ahmed Hamdan in "related cases"). On June 29, 2006, the Supreme Court ruled that the US President exceeded his authority in establishing the military commissions at Guantánamo Bay. The Court also ruled that the commissions violated U.S. military law and the Geneva Conventions.

A controversial new bill was passed by the US Senate and the House of Representatives in late September 2006.

The Military Commissions Act, which is heavily criticised by human rights organisations
- allows terror suspects to be tried by military tribunals rather than civilian courts
- gives defendants a legal right to see evidence and a (limited) right to counsel
- forbids "serious" breaches of the Geneva Conventions, such as torture, in the course of interrogation procedures
- gives the president the authority to "interpret the meaning and application of the Geneva Conventions"
- allows for hearsay evidence in trials of terror suspects.

Furthermore, the new legislation will prohibit any person from invoking the Geneva Conventions or their protocols as a source of rights in any action in any US court.

The new bill will enter into force following signature by the President.
Print  Send to a friend  Add to my favorites  
  also known as :
  Abdul Bari
  last time seen :
  Guantanamo
  charges :
  Other
War crimes
  profile last modified :
  18.03.2008
 
icl
Trial Watch has benefited from a financial support from the Loterie Romande and the City of Geneva.
Copyrights © 2008 trial-ch.org. All rights reserved - DB Engineering: J. Bédat, Design: X. Righetti - Legal informations