english  français  deutsch  | Sitemap | Home

Bringing justice to victims of international crimes
  Alex Tamba Brima
  Moinina Fofana
  Augustine Gbao
  Ibrahim Bazzy Kamara
  Santigie Borbor Kanu
  Allieu Kondewa
  Samuel Hinga Norman
  Foday Sankoh
  Issa Hassan Sesay
  Charles Taylor
 Decision on challenge to jurisdiction: Lomé Accord Amnesty
Special court for Sierra Leone Appeals chamber (Part I)
 Decision on challenge to jurisdiction: Lomé Accord Amnesty
Special court for Sierra Leone Appeals chamber (Part II)
 SUMMARY OF DECISION ON PRELIMINARY MOTION BASED ON LACK
(english)
You have information to share ?
Or mistakes to correct ?
click here...

Receive future updates of this profile in your e-mail :

 

 

Become a member

 

 

Donate

 

 

Link to our Website

Morris Kallon

context : Sierra Leone Search
judgement place : Sierra Leone Special Court Search
status : Sentenced
particulars : Trial began on 5 June 2004 before the Special Court for Sierra Leone; found guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity and sentenced to 39 years imprisonment on 8 April 2009; sentence confirmed by the Appeals Chamber on 26 October 2009
position : Military Commander in the RUF
facts legal procedurespotlight
Messrs Kallon and Kamara(a senior member of the AFRC) filed a preliminary appeal on 16 June 2003 and 22 September 2003 respectively, arguing that the government of Sierra Leone was tied to the amnesty granted by Article IX of the Lomé Accord of 7 July 1999 and that the Court should not be in a position to prosecute a crime which had been committed prior to this Accord.

The Appeals Court rejected the appeal on 13 March 2004.

The Lomé Accord stipulates under Article IX that “ …the government of Sierra Leone should ensure that no official or judicial action be undertaken against any member of the RUF/SL ex _AFRC…”. The Appeal Court judged that this referred to measures undertaken by Sierra Leone and not, as in the case in question, measures taken under the auspices of the international community.

The Court of Appeal judged that the granting of an amnesty is part of the sovereign prerogatives of a State and is closely linked to the power of the State to exercise its criminal jurisdiction.

However, in a situation where universal competence exists to prosecute a crime, a State cannot deprive another of the right to exercise this competence by granting amnesties. This is why it is unrealistic to consider a national amnesty as universally applicable in a situation where international crimes, involving universal jurisdiction, are concerned. A State cannot simply set these crimes aside when other States have the competence to try them. According to the Appeals Court, granting amnesty for crimes such as defined in Articles 2 and 4 of the SCSL Statute is in breach of the international obligation to try such crimes.

Thus, the Lomé Accord does not constitute an obstacle to prosecuting accused persons by an International Tribunal or by a third party State.
Print  Send to a friend  Add to my favorites  
 nationality :
 Sierra leone
 date of birth :
 01.01.1964
  also known as :
  Bilai Karim
  last time seen :
  Rwanda
  judgement period :
  05.06.2004 - 26.10.2009
  charges :
  Crimes against humanity
War crimes
  profile last modified :
  23.12.2009
 
icl
Trial Watch has benefited from a financial support from the Loterie Romande and the City of Geneva.
Copyrights © 2010 trial-ch.org. All rights reserved - DB Engineering: J. Bédat, Design: X. Righetti - Legal informations