Trial Watch   About Us   ACT   International   Swiss   Biblio   Links   Contact
  english  français  deutsch  | Sitemap

  Ibrahim Ahmed Mahmoud Al Qosi
  Omar Ahmed Khadr
  Ali Hamza Ahmad Sulayman al Bahlul
  Abdul Zahir
 Federal appeals court refuses to reconsider 'enemy combatant' evidence ruling
Jurist Paper Chase, 1 February 2008
 Military Commissions Act of 2006
 Supreme Court weighs Guantanamo habeas cases
Jurist Paper Chase, 5 December 2007
 Kind beißt Hund - Frankfurter Allgemeine
25.07.2008
Die Deutsche Fußball-Liga ist mit ihren Plänen für die Vermarktung der Fernseh-Bundesligarechte beim Kartellamt abgeblitzt. Die Fans können weiterhin eine zeitnahe Highlight ...
TRIAL_TXT_RSS display all...
You have information to share ?
Or mistakes to correct ?
click here...

Receive future updates of this profile in your e-mail :

 

 

Become a member

 

 

Donate

 

 

Link to our Website

Salim Ahmed Hamdan

context : Afghanistan Search
judgement place : United States Search
status : On trial
particulars : Charged with conspiracy and providing material support for terrorism by the Pentagon (USA); trial began on 21 July 2008
position : Usama bin Laden’s former bodyguard and driver
facts legal procedurespotlight
The military commission proceedings at Guantánamo are the first such war crimes trials conducted by the United States since World War II.

Of the 500 or so captives brought to Guantánamo from Afghanistan since 2002, only a small fraction is facing a military commission.

Human rights activists and military defence lawyers have criticized the commission rules, saying they favour prosecutors, allow evidence obtained through torture and hearsay and permit only limited independent judicial review. Critics also note that the Pentagon has never said it would actually free a defendant if he were acquitted.

Furthermore, the detainees were said to be charged with conducts that were not previously crimes or not previously recognized as war crimes.

The Supreme Court heard on March 28, 2006, a challenge to George W. Bush's power to create military commissions to put Guantanamo prisoners on trial for war crimes. On June 29, 2006, the Supreme Court ruled that the US President exceeded his authority in establishing the military commissions at Guantánamo Bay. The Court also ruled that the commissions violated U.S. military law and the Geneva Conventions.

A controversial new bill was passed by the US Senate and the House of Representatives in late September 2006.

The Military Commissions Act, which is heavily criticised by human rights organisations
- allows terror suspects to be tried by military tribunals rather than civilian courts
- gives defendants a legal right to see evidence and a (limited) right to counsel
- forbids "serious" breaches of the Geneva Conventions, such as torture, in the course of interrogation procedures
- gives the president the authority to "interpret the meaning and application of the Geneva Conventions"
- allows for hearsay evidence in trials of terror suspects.

Furthermore, the new legislation prohibits any person from invoking the Geneva Conventions or their protocols as a source of rights in any action in any US court.

The new bill entered into force following signature by the President.

On 7 June 2007, the US Senate Judiciary Committee voted 11-8 in support of The Habeas Corpus Restoration Act which, if adopted, would allow Guantanamo detainees to challenge their detention in US federal courts for the first time since the Military Commissions Act of 2006 revoked that right.
Print  Send to a friend  Add to my favorites  
  last time seen :
  Guantanamo
  judgement period :
  21.07.2008
  charges :
  War crimes
  profile last modified :
  22.07.2008
 
icl

 

Display All...

Trial Watch has benefited from a financial support from the Loterie Romande and the City of Geneva.
Copyrights © 2008 trial-ch.org. All rights reserved - DB Engineering: J. Bédat, Design: X. Righetti - Legal informations